|
Undisclosed Agricultural building – East Kent |
10th
January 2015 |
|
Background: |
||
|
||
The Investigation | ||
Apparatus: Camcorders: Sony DCR HC-62 with night vision and Sony HVL-IRM IR light Sony DCR-DVD110E with night vision and Sony HVL- IRM IR light Digital Camera: Voice recorder: Other: Investigators: Ian, Kim, Paddy, Dave, Graham and Dean. Method: Investigation: |
||
Results | ||
Session 1 – Group vigil in main
building. Dave saw a small pin prick of red light. The team all hear a knock that they think came from Ian’s left hand side. This was recorded on our equipment and can be seen and heard on the investigation video that accompanies this report. A repeat was requested but was not forthcoming, however a different type of odd noise was recorded on Ian’s camcorder footage, but not heard by the team at the time. Ian later also saw a red pin prick of light on the other side of the barn. This is possibly a trick of the eye. Dave hears a knock to his right that some of the team hear also. Dave asked for a repeat, this was followed shortly after by another knock. Some shuffling could be heard followed by another knock to Ian’s left. Ian then thinks he sees a face to the rear of the bay to his left where the knocks were coming from. He described this as skeletal and fading in and out, this continued for a few minutes and was not a fleeting occurrence. Dave later called for activity followed by a couple of noises. After the session Dave and Ian’s camcorders were left running as was Deans Voice recorder, during the first break some interesting noises were recorded. Creaks, knocks and groans can be heard. The recording from Dean’s voice recorder is the most compelling being the clearest and sounded like movement and activity whilst the team were not there. Again watch the investigation video on our You Tube channel to see what you think. Session 2
– Solo vigil experiment #1 Session 4 – Group vigil at base |
||
Conclusions | ||
The noises heard in general throughout the investigation
both in the larger building and at base were singular and not repeated when
requested. As there appeared to be no intelligent pattern to these and they
seemed to be more random and coincidental we cannot rule out that these
were all naturally occurring. In both buildings there are possible causes
for these whether it was lights cooling, heater thermostats clicking, bats
(in the barn), rodent movements, wind etc. because of this we cannot say
that any of these noises had paranormal origins. Of more interest is the noises captured during the first break when our equipment was left running in the larger building. The creaks and sounds of movement heard and recorded during this time seem to have more of a definitive quality, as though intentional. Sadly all be it more interesting we still cannot draw the conclusion that these were paranormal in nature, but they were certainly interesting. The face Ian saw and the red lights seen by both Ian and Dave in session one could all easily have been tricks of the eye caused by shadows or tiredness and equally could well have a natural explanation. The solo vigils were a departure for us and were interesting to do, and this experiment may well be repeated if a future venue can accommodate this. Whilst it appeared that the attempts at communication failed and neither Dave nor Ian received the sensations being willed upon them by the rest of the team, there were a few interesting points of note. These were Ian having the sensation of dizziness and feeling light headed followed later by a slight head ache, when the team asked for Ian to feel a sense of pain or pressure in his forehead. Dave on the other hand did feel what he described as a breath across his face when the team asked for a sensation of heat about his neck and head. Dave also said afterwards that he felt a sensation of pulling on his left ear. Ian had asked that Dave received a flick on his left ear. As for the ESP twist to the experiment the team tried to convey a purple square to Ian, he came back with red triangle. Dave on the other hand was conveyed a yellow circle and came back with an orange circle, so 50% correct. We cannot draw any conclusions from these experiments but they were interesting to participate in. As Ghost Connections conducts scientifically based investigations we
do not normally publish information of a clairvoyant nature, however,
for the purpose of this report this information has been included as footage
of these moments has been included in the accompanying investigation videos.
Should you wish to discuss this information, or the contents of this report
please email us. |
||
Thanks | ||
Many thanks as always for the continued support of the owners and for allowing us regular access. | ||
©2004/2015 Ghost Connections UK |