Undisclosed 14th Century Manor House, Kent
5th December 2009
We have been asked not to identify this venue at the custodians request but have been fortunate to have been entrusted with overnight access, to try to explain experiences and sensations felt by people here, as well as better understand our own results from previous investigation here.
This is the same manor house that we were last privileged to have spent
a weekend at. Throughout our investigations at this house we have experienced
many things that lead us to further investigations in the same or different
locations within the house and this was an opportunity to do just that.
To continue our study into potential paranormal phenomena at this location.
Previously we had simply spent our time conducting group vigils in different areas of the building. When doing so we had noted a large amount of noise, taps and knocks were heard, as well as a sense and sound of movement. We wished to investigate these further with vigils in previously investigated locations and those that we had previously sought to visit due to previous events. High on this list were two corridors, one on the ground floor and one on the first floor where we had previously experienced either physical and audible phenomena and had a different approach to try, or unexplainable noises had later been found on recorded footage.
Samsung VP-D351 with night vision
We thought by placing ourselves out we stood the best chance of identifying sources for the noises we had previously encountered in and around this area. It was not to prove as easy as that.
Paddy and Dave both heard the sound of footfalls on the floor. Dave put it towards Paddy and Paddy put it into the kitchen by Kim although Kim stated she didn't hear it.
There was a noise on the staircase and this was heard by all the team. At the same time Ian described a similar noise occurring in the room where he was.
Ian then heard a louder thump within the house.
The wind then started to pick up in gusts and was born in mind for future noises.
Ian heard a tap within his room followed by another near Dave and another near Ian.
All the team then heard a sound they described as being of clothes rustling together. This was followed during the discussion by a vocal exclamation.
Fireworks then started and these noises were taken into account too.
Dave thought he heard a sigh.
There was then a thud which was heard by the team and likened by Ian
to the one he heard earlier.
In order to examine the possibility that the door opened it was left secure with a cam corder zoomed on the mortice lock.
The team noted that the atmosphere in the room had a 'heavy' feel to
Kim stated she could hear talking.
Various taps were then heard from the area of the end wall of the room
which adjoins the rest of the house.
The team then decided to undo the door and leave it ajar.
An attempt was made to gain a response to noises we made by knocking. Some noises were heard but any request for repetition by means of two noises was not forthcoming.
With a heavy atmosphere perceived to be present Dave worked on the premise that perhaps someone did not actually want the team within the room. Asking for a definate gesture one tap was heard albeit faint. A repeat was asked for and not forthcoming.
The temperature dropping and the team becoming uncomfortable chose to re-locate.
The team relocated to a room termed as 'The Flat', an area consisting of two rooms with no door between. This was at the end of the previously noted first floor corridor where Ian's camcorder caught some unexplained noises on a previous investigation. The team decided to attempt a séance in this area.
A footfall was heard on the bare floorboards behind the team.
A loud bang was heard in the area of a window. A repetition was asked for but was not forthcoming.
After some waiting a sound similar to the above was heard. Again it was not repeated on request.
A sound like a groaning voice was heard.
The team broke the session when Kim's voice recorder began beeping. It transpired that it was set to Super High Quality which is not our normal setting due to the duration that can be recorded on this setting which is only 4hrs 45min.
During the break, and the team being completely outside the premise, there is a sound like a loud tap recorded on the video footage that was left to run to the end of the tape.
The team returned to the same room and repeated the séance exercise.
Nothing of interest was noted and the investigation concluded.
The footfall heard by Paddy and Dave was clear to them yet was not heard by Kim who it is suggested the noise was closer to. It was not recorded on any equipment and therefore is difficult to comment further on.
The noise on the staircase was recorded and can be heard on our footage. It was wooden in sound and did not occur a second time so could not be immediately identified. It is not the first time we have encountered sounds on the staircase of an unexplained nature. We cannot say that this one is definitely unidentified but was its location more than coincidence?
The noise occurring that the same time by Ian was not picked up on the
footage and was not heard by the rest of the team although this may have
been because we reacted so instantly to the first one and were talking.
The two may, or may not, be connected.
Only the second of three noises was picked up on a recording. They all appeared to occur in slightly different places only a few metres apart. They were difficult to place and not able to be traced to anything specific. They were not repeated.
The team initially accused each other of making the sound of clothing moving but all heard it and all denied moving at all. It was recorded on video footage and can be viewed with the clip from this investigation.
The vocal exclamation came just before Dave began a sentence. Again everyone was adamant it wasn't them and it was recorded.
We cannot offer a reasonable explanation for either of these two. The clothing sound is more difficult if no-one moved and there was no one else and no objects capable of such a noise, randomly, being present. The vocal noise may have sub-consciously been one of the team although we are adamant that it wasn't.
However in relation to the sound of clothing movement, a careful study of Dave's footage revealed that the two sounds which made up this incident was Paddy removing his right hand from his trouser pocket and placing it on his camera. This just shows how small movements are not noticed and even disputed readily. Only the presence of a camcorder showed what the actual cause of this noise was. At least our association of the sound to the movement of clothing was correct.
The sigh that Dave thought he heard was not heard by anyone else and does not appear on the footage. It may have been some other noise unheard by the team or purely imagined.
The thud was, by process of elimination, placed outside and believed to be a car door or similar shutting. It was discounted from further investigation.
When measured, the significant difference in temperature was only 1 deg C. This does not present a great difference to comment upon although was noted. The corridor to this room and the room itself are both located in a narrow projection from the main house so are more susceptible to being influenced by the outdoor temperature than some other rooms in the house.
The 'heavy' or 'oppressive' atmosphere commented on had no substance.
This may well have been due to the events that proceeded it influencing
the teams thoughts.
No other members of the team heard voices and they were not heard again.
Tapping noises where no identified although could feasibly have been rodents or other wildlife or natural noises within the walls.
Kim did not describe any further what she saw in the room. It cannot
be explained. There was no moonlight or outside lighting likely to cause
any shadows and all of our light sources were accounted for. At the moment
of this report none of our light sources moved so they can be discounted
from causing a moving shadow.
It was not possible to identify the cause of any noises that we heard.
They may have been within the room although efforts to identify the location
found that on each occasion they appeared to come from a different place.
In this way it was impossible to theorise as to their cause. No intelligent
repetition was forthcoming and therefore they may have been entirely natural.
The fact that a 'tap' was heard by the team at an exact moment that a specific request was made is of interest although the source of this cannot be established beyond doubt. No repetition was made when requested and therefore no comparison could be made and neither could any progression to conversation. This was recorded.
The temperature dropping was probably psychosomatic due to the initial
temperature and also due to the drop in temperature outside and increased
rainfall we were experiencing and able to hear also.
A footfall was clearly heard in the empty room. The room is completely devoid of furniture with bare floorboards. There I nothing else within the room that can make a noise. There is nothing in the area the noise came from that could be confused with the noise we heard. This was not recorded.
The loud bang heard in the area of the window can safely be assumed to have been the window as there is nothing else in the room. It was believed to be something against the window until it was realised that there is nothing outside to touch the window even thought the wind was increasing. Its cause is not known but was not repeated on request.
After some waiting a sound similar to the above was heard. Again it was not repeated on request.
The groaning voice was heard by all of the team so at least a sound similar to this can be verified although its source was not identified due to there being nothing, and no-one, else within the room. It was not recorded, unfortunately, so cannot be compared or retained for analysis.
The team broke the session when Kim's voice recorder began beeping. The fact that it ran out of memory space caused the warning noise. Normally this is set to a longer setting to allow enough space for the whole investigation and can only be changed through repeated button pressing through a menu on screen. When switched off it cannot be altered and is transported in its own padded case. It would not have been altered for any reason during the investigation. We cannot explain this occurrence. It is not something that has happened before.
The sound during the break appears to be within the room but is unlike the previous noise on the window and no other noises were heard during this session so no conclusion can be drawn.
No events were noted and therefore no conclusions can be drawn from this session.
During our stay a certain amount of other information was forthcoming
to the team of a clairvoyant nature. As Ghost Connections conducts scientifically
based investigations we do not publish such observations, however, this
information is held on a separate database and may prove interesting when
compared to other peoples experiences. Should you wish to discuss this
information please email
We continue to find this premise of great interest and worthy of investigation.
|Many thanks as always to the custodians of this venue, and for letting us return.|
©2004/2010 Ghost Connections UK